| 160 | 0 | 50 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
预拌流态固化土作为一种新型岩土工程材料,其性能受配合比、土壤类型、含水率等因素的影响。为探究不同土质制备的流态固化土的力学特性、抗冲刷性能及植生效应的差异,以砂土和壤土为基料制备流态固化土,对比分析其抗剪性、抗冲性、植生性能以及植物生长条件下流态固化土的抗冲性,并通过扫描电镜观察固化土的微观结构与试验结果相验证。结果表明,抗剪强度随固化剂掺量的增加而增大,固化剂掺量较低时砂土固化土抗剪强度要优于壤土固化土,当固化剂配合比大于水泥掺量4%、水泥激发剂掺量2%时情况相反;随固化剂掺量增加,固化土冲刷量先减少后趋于稳定,且壤土固化土抗冲性始终优于砂土固化土;随固化剂掺量增加植生情况明显恶化,相同固化剂掺量下,砂土固化土出苗率较高,但壤土固化土植株株高更优;植物覆被可显著提升固化土抗冲能力,且对壤土固化土的改善作用优于砂土固化土。
Abstract:As a novel geotechnical engineering material, the properties of pre-mixed fluidized solidified soil are affected by factors such as mix ratio, soil type, and moisture content. To investigate the differences in mechanical characteristics, anti-scouring performance, and vegetation effects of fluidized solidified soil prepared from different soil types, this study utilized sandy soil and loamy soil as base materials to prepare fluidized solidified soil. A comparative analysis was conducted on their shear resistance, anti-scouring performance, vegetation characteristics, and the anti-scouring performance of fluidized solidified soil under plant growth conditions. Scanning electron microscopy(SEM) was employed to observe the microstructure of the solidified soil, and the results were validated against experimental data. The results indicate that shear strength increases with the increase of curing agent content. When the curing agent content is low, the shear strength of sandy soil solidified soil is superior to that of loamy soil solidified soil. However, when the mix ratio of the curing agent exceeds 4% cement content and 2% cement activator content, the opposite is observed. With the increase of curing agent content, the scouring amount of solidified soil initially decreases and then stabilizes. The anti-scouring performance of loamy soil solidified soil consistently outperforms that of sandy soil solidified soil. Vegetation conditions significantly deteriorate with the increase of curing agent content. At the same curing agent content, the germination rate of sandy soil solidified soil is higher, but the plant height in loamy soil solidified soil is superior. Vegetation cover can significantly enhance the anti-scouring capacity of solidified soil, with a more pronounced improvement effect on loamy soil solidified soil compared to sandy soil solidified soil.
[1] 徐日庆,文嘉毅,董梅.工业废料固化浅层淤泥质土研究[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(5):85-91.
[2] 赵品晖,周旭,樊亮,等.基于固体废弃物的固化土研究综述[J].新型建筑材料,2024,51(1):78-85.
[3] 张传耀,胡兴波,叶康军,等.不同黏合剂与纤维组合对喷播基材抗剪性能及植物生长的影响[J/OL].草原与草坪.https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1156.S.20240416.1010.017.
[4] 方军辉,朱德滨,程承,等.客土喷播的护坡机理及基材和施工等控制要点[J].森林工程,2014,30(3):116-119,123.
[5] 陈建国,周靖靖,顾业莲,等.改性水泥土力学性能及植生性能试验[J].新型建筑材料,2022,49(6):12-16,22.
[6] TANG W,MOHSENI E,WANG Z Y.Development of vegetation concrete technology for slope protection and greening[J].Construction and building materials,2018,179:605-613.
[7] 张亚军,杨寅,陈潇.钢渣固化土的性能研究及其固化机理的解耦分析[J].功能材料,2022,53(10):10167-10179.
[8] 林文逸,方祥位,雷运涛,等.流态固化淤泥复合胶凝材料配比优化及其固化机理[J/OL].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2024:1-11.(2024-11-01).
[9] 张顶飞,刘涛,郝琪,等.固废基地质聚合物固化沿海软土的力学机理与劣化性能研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2024,32(6):1582-1596.
[10] 苏文轩,宁宝宽,刘剑平,等.水泥与碱激发材料协同固化氯盐渍土的机理研究[J].建筑材料学报,2025,28(1):26-32,41.
[11] 汤怡新,刘汉龙,朱伟.水泥固化土工程特性试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2000,22(5):549-554.
[12] 杜建彪,罗强,蒋良潍,等.膨胀土流态固化改性试验与配合比研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2024,58(10):2137-2148.
[13] 刘振建,姚达,邱成春,等.水泥-粉煤灰固化海相淤泥质软土力学特性室内试验研究[J].江苏水利,2024(11):34-38.
[14] 李雪和,杨耀辉,韦金城,等.矿渣-钢渣-脱硫石膏-水泥稳定粉土的强度及固化机理[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,54(6):2382-2390.
[15] 林俊臣,赵亮,杨永光.流态固化土填充溶洞施工技术研究[J].科技创新与应用,2024,14(35):175-178.
[16] 张霁川,何浪军,刘逾亮,等.预拌流态固化土在软土地基肥槽回填中的应用[J].建筑技术,2024,55(18):2208-2211.
[17] 李明月,陈少军,郑巍,等.深基坑狭窄肥槽预拌流态固化土回填施工技术[J].建筑施工,2024,46(2):169-172.
[18] 贾建栋,宋千军,杨涛,等.液态固化土在深基坑肥槽回填中的应用[J].建筑施工,2023,45(10):2049-2051.
[19] 范惜辉,王宁宁,高军,等.预拌流态固化土在管道工程的应用[J].价值工程,2023,42(4):121-123.
[20] 李晓琛,卓泽昌,刘凤妮,等.管道回填流态粉煤灰固化土混合料的性能研究[J].建筑监督检测与造价,2022,15(4):12-16.
[21] 夏玮彤.降雨条件下无磺木质素协同疏水材料复合固化盐渍土边坡试验研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2024.
[22] 吴丹.土壤固化剂改善红层土边坡抗冲刷性试验研究[D].绵阳:西南科技大学,2017.
[23] 中国工程建设标准化协会.预拌流态固化土填筑技术标准:T/CECS 1037-2022[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2022.
[24] 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.土工试验方法标准(GB/T 50123-2019)[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2019.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20250035
中图分类号:TU43
引用信息:
[1]马亨通,郄志红,吴天齐,等.基于砂土与壤土的流态固化土工程性能及植生特性对比研究[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(12):78-83.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20250035.
基金信息:
河北省水利科技计划项目(2022-13)