nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 09, v.43 52-55+109
基于网络文本的水利风景区生态系统文化服务感知研究
基金项目(Foundation): 河南省教育科学规划重点课题(2023JKZD10); 河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目(研究生教育类)(2023SJGLX113Y)
邮箱(Email): lihu@ncwu.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20241918
摘要:

水利风景区是生态文明建设的重要窗口。以20家国家水利风景区为研究对象,使用大众点评数据,通过构建水利风景区CES词典,从疫情期间和疫情后两个阶段,分析公众对CES的感知频率和满意度,应用IPA模型对水利风景区进行评价。结果显示,公众对水利风景区的关注重点集中在消费、交通、景区环境和水利工程等方面,不同阶段存在差异;两阶段(疫情期间、疫情后)中美学价值和休闲游憩的感知频率均最高,灵感服务的频率均最低,疫情期间科普教育的感知频率明显降低;整体满意度在疫情期间为80.51%,疫情后为82.15%;未来河南省水利风景区建设应注重社会关系和科普教育服务,同时充分挖掘文化历史和精神服务的潜力。研究对水利风景区评价与规划建设有重要意义。

Abstract:

Water park is an important window of ecological civilization construction. Taking 20 national water parks as examples, using the public comment data, the CES dictionary of water park was constructed to analyze the public perception frequency and satisfaction of the CES during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. And then IPA model was used to evaluate water park. The results show that the public focus on water park are consumption, transportation, scenic spot environment and water conservancy engineering, and there are differences in different stages; The frequency of aesthetic value and recreation is the highest, and the frequency of inspiration service is the lowest. The frequency of popular science education is lower during the COVID-19 pandemic; The overall satisfaction is 80.51% during the COVID-19 pandemic and 82.15% after the COVID-19 pandemic ends; The future construction of water park in Henan Province should pay attention to social relations and science education service, while fully exploiting the potential of cultural history and spiritual service. The research is of great significance to the evaluation and planning and construction of water park.

参考文献

[1] MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (MEA).Ecosystems and human well-being:Synthesis[M].Washington,DC:World Resources Institute,2005.

[2] 李林汝,员学锋,张瑞娜,等.基于最大熵模型的生态系统文化服务空间分异及其对环境要素的响应分析——以陕北榆林市为例[J].生态学报,2024,44(21):9582-9595.

[3] 孙秀锋,李旭,杨德伟,等.基于多源数据的重庆中心城区绿地生态系统文化服务供需关系研究[J].西部人居环境学刊,2024,39(3):162-168.

[4] 张昊杰,李传武,刘永芳.盐城黄海湿地世界自然遗产地生态系统服务价值评估[J].水电能源科学,2024,42(9):48-51.

[5] 赵雨晴,游巍斌,林雪儿,等.游客和居民视角下武夷山市生态系统文化服务感知比较研究[J].生态学报,2022,42(10):4011-4022.

[6] EBNER M,SCHIRPKE U,TAPPEINER U.Combining multiple socio-cultural approaches-Deeper insights into cultural ecosystem services of mountain lakes?[J].Landscape and urban planning,2022,228:104549.

[7] SUKHDEV P,WITTMER H,SCHR?TER-SCHLAACK C,et al.Mainstreaming the economics of nature:A synthesis of the approach,conclusions and recommendations of TEEB[M].Malta:Progress Press,2010.

[8] HAINES-YOUNG R,POTSCHIN-YOUNG M.Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5.1):A policy rief[J].One ecosystem,2018,3:e27108.

[9] 中华人民共和国水利部.水利风景区评价规范:SL/T 300-2023[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2023.

[10] 中华人民共和国水利部.水利风景区规划编制导则:SL 471-2010[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2010.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20241918

中图分类号:G122;X171.1

引用信息:

[1]吴猛,李虎,卢玫珺.基于网络文本的水利风景区生态系统文化服务感知研究[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(09):52-55+109.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20241918.

基金信息:

河南省教育科学规划重点课题(2023JKZD10); 河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目(研究生教育类)(2023SJGLX113Y)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文