| 133 | 0 | 20 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
洪泛湿地韧性对水资源、水环境、水生态和水安全具有重要保障作用,构建洪泛湿地韧性状态评估指标体系,有助于系统地反映湿地整体韧性的状态,使得在制定洪泛湿地保护策略及可持续发展规划等方面更为精准有效。基于文献可视化分析对洪泛湿地韧性内涵予以明确,采用TCI模型结合相关性分析、随机森林重要度分析、专家咨询等方法构建了洪泛湿地韧性状态指标体系。结果表明,生态韧性内涵可总结为“抵抗力-恢复力-适应力”,构建的指标体系包含“人口密度”等15项指标,其中抵抗力、恢复力与适应力均为5项指标,信息贡献率为91.67%,能够准确反映洪泛湿地的韧性状态,为洪泛韧性湿地构建提供理论依据和方法支撑。
Abstract:The resilience of flooded wetlands plays an important role in guaranteeing water resources, water environment, water ecology and water security. The construction of the resilience assessment index system of flooded wetlands helps to systematically reflect the overall resilience of wetlands, and makes the formulation of flood wetland protection strategies and sustainable development planning more accurate and effective. Based on literature visualization analysis, the connotation of resilience of flooded wetlands was defined. The TCI model combined with correlation analysis, random forest importance analysis, expert consultation and other methods were used to construct resilience state index system of flooded wetlands. The results show that the connotation of ecological resilience can be summarized as "resistance-resilience-adaptability". The constructed index system includes 15 indicators such as "population density", among which resistance, resilience and adaptability are all 5 indicators, and the information contribution rate is 91.67%, which can accurately reflect the resilience state of flooded wetlands. Thus, it provides theoretical basis and method support for the construction of flood wetland toughness.
[1] 崔庚,佟守正,吕宪国,等.洪泛湿地潜流带水动力过程研究综述[J].湿地科学,2024,22(2):282-290.
[2] 张永香,王红丽,邵雪梅,等.中国过去530年高分辨率格点化降水重建与极端干旱事件 [J].Science Bulletin,2024,69(17):2756-2764.
[3] DAVIDSON N C.How much wetland has the world lost?Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area[J].Marine and freshwater research,2014,65(10):934.
[4] WAMELINK W,VAN DOBBEN H F,GOEDHART P W,et al.The role of abiotic soil parameters as a factor in the success of invasive plant species[J].Emerging science journal,2018,2(6):308-365.
[5] STEVENS R A,SHULL S,CARTER J,et al.Marsh migration and beyond:A scalable framework to assess tidal wetland resilience and support strategic management[J].PLoSone,2023,18(11):e0293177.
[6] 赵志龙,杨亚锋,徐冬梅,等.基于二级模糊综合评判法的水资源系统韧性评价调控模型及应用[J].水电能源科学,2022,40(10):39-43.
[7] 陈秋霏.黄河流域城市韧性评价及提升路径研究[D].太原:山西财经大学,2024.
[8] 盛强,郑建明,刘江山,等.基于CiteSpace的内表面缺陷检测研究进展与趋势[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2023,43(1):9-15.
[9] 王春青,鲜杭键,芦国斌,等.长春市地铁轻轨站内实测PM2.5,PM10分析[J].吉林建筑大学学报,2023,40(1):60-66.
[10] 何峻,于建军,荣晓慧.科研机构整体绩效评价指标体系优化研究[J].图书情报工作,2024,68(11):72-81.
[11] 朱佳慧,于丽英.我国科技创新与金融发展的耦合协同测度——基于VIF-变异系数的筛选[J].上海大学学报(自然科学版),2021,27(4):785-794.
[12] 周立斌,李刚,迟国泰.基于R聚类-变异系数分析的人的全面发展评价指标体系构建[J].系统工程,2010,28(12):56-63.
[13] 汪辉,徐蕴雪,卢思琪,等.恢复力、弹性或韧性?——社会——生态系统及其相关研究领域中“Resilience”一词翻译之辨析[J].国际城市规划,2017,32(4):29-39.
[14] 杜钟婧,丁正山,穆学青,等.旅游地社会—生态系统韧性的时空跃迁特征与驱动因素——以长三角城市群为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2023,39(6):115-124,133.
[15] 李加林,张旖芯,张海涛,等.基于“潜力-弹性-稳定性”模型的温州市生态韧性时空变化及影响因素研究[J].生态学报,2024,44(8):3253-3267.
[16] 江西省市场监督管理局.河湖(水库)健康评价导则:DB36/T 1404-2021[S].
[17] 北京市市场监督管理局.城市韧性评价导则:DB11/T 2280-2024[S].
基本信息:
DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20250010
中图分类号:X37
引用信息:
[1]刁造伟,胡芳,刘心愿,等.洪泛湿地韧性状态评估指标体系构建研究[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(12):53-56+62.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20250010.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划(2023YFC3209000-05)