| 393 | 0 | 194 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为有效应对珠江河口区咸潮上溯日趋加重的问题,利用磨刀门水道逐时观测数据,基于梯度提升决策树(GBDT)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、轻量级梯度提升(LightGBM)、类别提升(CatBoost)模型框架,结合可解释性的SHAP模型进行咸潮上溯逐时预报。结果表明,4种机器学习算法模型均具有较好的预报效果,其中CatBoost模型表现最好,24 h预见期模型纳什效率系数为0.738 5;基于SHAP模型特征重要性排序进一步优选输入因子,可以提高模型精度,优化后的CatBoost模型纳什效率系数、相关系数分别提升了0.30%、0.13%;对咸潮上溯预报不同特征进行SHAP分析可提高模型可解释性,分析发现盐度特征对咸潮上溯预报呈线性正相关影响,单一特征的SHAP分布图散点的分布越集中,特征重要性越大。
Abstract:To address the increasingly severe issue of saltwater intrusion in the Pearl River Estuary, based on the hourly observational data of the Modaomen Waterway and machine learning frameworks including Gradient Boosting Decision Tree(GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting(XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine(LightGBM), and Categorical Boosting(CatBoost), hourly saltwater intrusion was predicted by the SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP) model. The results show that all four machine learning models have good predictive performance, with the CatBoost model achieving the best results, yielding a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient of 0.738 5 for a 24-hour lead time. Feature importance ranking based on the SHAP model enabled further optimization of input factors, improving model accuracy. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient and correlation coefficient of the optimized CatBoost model increased by 0.30% and 0.13%, respectively. The SHAP analysis of different features enhanced model interpretability, revealing a linear positive correlation between salinity characteristics and saltwater intrusion predictions. The more concentrated the SHAP distribution of a single feature, the greater its importance is.
[1] 陈文龙,刘万根,张康,等.粤港澳大湾区水资源安全战略思考[J].中国水利,2022(5):54-57.
[2] 陈致远,吴敬文,乔红杰,等.极端干旱下长江口咸潮入侵成因及压咸补淡措施[J].人民长江,2024,55(6):98-105.
[3] 周凡涵,刘丙军,胡家昱,等.基于人工神经网络的河口区盐水入侵预报研究[J].水文,2020,40(6):55-62.
[4] 林中源,黄鹏飞,吕超寅,等.珠江河口磨刀门水道枯季咸潮预报模型研究[J].中国防汛抗旱,2023,33(6):20-24.
[5] WENG P Y,TIAN Y,ZHOU H,et al.Saltwater intrusion early warning in Pearl River Delta based on the temporal clustering method[J].Journal of environmental management,2024,349:119443.
[6] 周佳佳.珠江口咸潮影响下供水安全应对策略研究[J].水上安全,2024(19):95-97.
[7] KE HUABIN,LIU BINGJUN,ZHANG WEN,et al.Study on prediction of saltwater intrusion based on support vector machine in the Pearl River Estuary[J].Journal of water resources research,2015,4(1):46-54.
[8] 王艺霖,苏程佳,陈晓宏,等.磨刀门水道枯水期咸潮变化趋势及成因[J].水资源保护,2019,35(2):37-43.
[9] MU?OZ SABATER J.(2019):ERA5-Land Hourly Data from 1950 to Present.Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS)[Z].https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/reanalysis-era5-land?tab=overview.
[10] 何超.风对冬季磨刀门水道咸潮入侵的影响机制研究[D].广州:中山大学,2010.
[11] 陈文龙,邹华志,董延军.磨刀门水道咸潮上溯动力特性分析[J].水科学进展,2014,25(5):713-723.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20242273
中图分类号:P731.34
引用信息:
[1]祝雨珂,易晶晶,刘培霖,等.基于可解释性机器学习算法的珠江河口区咸潮上溯预报[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(10):18-22.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20242273.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划(2024YFC3212000); 广东省水利科技创新项目(2023-01); 广东省科技计划项目(2024B1212040001); 国家自然科学基金项目(51879289)