nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 09, v.43 150-155
岩溶地区抽水蓄能电站下水库渗控方案优化
基金项目(Foundation): 综合交通实验室开放基金课题(MTF2023010); 国家自然科学基金项目(52179130)
邮箱(Email): zhzhshen@hhu.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20241141
摘要:

某抽水蓄能电站下水库所处岩溶环境复杂,为此建立三维渗流分析有限元模型,对库区主要建筑物和岩溶通道进行模拟,采用“坝基防渗帷幕深度为0.5倍坝前水头、两岸防渗帷幕深度为3 Lu线以下3 m、右岸防渗帷幕长度为200 m、设置单排帷幕”作为初步渗控方案,对库区渗流场、渗透坡降及渗透量进行计算分析,发现初步渗控方案满足规范要求,但渗流量和渗透坡降接近临界值。为优化渗控方案,基于初步渗控方案,改变两岸帷幕深度、坝基帷幕深度、右岸帷幕长度、设置双排帷幕4项指标,研究各指标变化对库区渗透量的影响,提出优化渗控方案。分析结果表明,初步方案基础上,在坝基处布置双排帷幕,坝基渗透流量减少267.3 m3/d,库区渗控效果显著。

Abstract:

Aiming at the complex karst environment of the lower reservoir of a pumped storage power station, a three-dimensional finite element model for seepage analysis was established to simulate the main buildings and karst passageways in the reservoir area. "The depth of seepage control curtain at the base of the dam is 0.5 times of the pre-dam head, the depth of seepage control curtain on both sides of the dam is 3 m below the 3 Lu line, the length of seepage control curtain on the right side of the dam is 200 m, and a single-row curtain is set up" is used as the preliminary seepage control scheme. The seepage field, infiltration slope and infiltration volume of the reservoir area were calculated. The preliminary seepage control scheme met the specification requirements. But the seepage rate and infiltration slope were close to the critical value. The four indexes of curtain depth on both sides of the bank, curtain depth at the base of the dam, length of curtain on the right bank, and double-row curtain were changed to optimize seepage control scheme. The impact of the changes of the indexes on the infiltration volume of the reservoir area was investigated so that the optimization of the seepage control scheme was put forward. The analysis results show that on the basis of the preliminary scheme, the double-row curtain is set up at the dam base, the infiltration flow at the dam base is reduced by 267.3 m3/d, and the effect of seepage control in the reservoir area is remarkable.

参考文献

[1] 陈晶华.抽水蓄能工程建设安全管理研究[J].电力安全技术,2023,25(3):7-10,13.

[2] 张轶博,王锦国,刘芮彤.岩溶包气带水流衰减过程与调蓄能力影响机制研究[J].中国岩溶,2023,42(6):1140-1148.

[3] 贾文涛,沈振中.复杂地质条件下某水库运行期左岸渗漏原因分析[J].水电能源科学,2021,39(12):108-111,39.

[4] 张文兵,沈振中,陈官运,等.岩溶发育地质条件下的库区三维渗流场分析及渗控效果评价[J].水资源与水工程学报,2020,31(5):218-224,234.

[5] ZHANG W B,SHEN Z Z,CHEN G Y,et al.Optimization design and assessment of the effect of seepage control at reservoir sites under Karst conditions:A case study in Anhui Province,China[J].Hydrogeology journal,2021,29(5):1831-1855.

[6] 吴忠康,陈文理.乌江构皮滩水利枢纽下坝址岩溶发育特征及工程地质条件[J].中国岩溶,1994,13(2):141-152.

[7] YANG J M,ZHAO L H,SHEN Z Z,et al.An efficient procedure for optimization design of anti-seepage curtains:A case study[J].Bulletin of engineering geology and the environment,2021,80(3):2671-2685.

[8] 任智丽,路明,孙小双.会仙湿地岩溶地下水数值模拟[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2020,18(5):157-164.

[9] 赵瑞,张强,许模,等.基于数值模拟的复杂岩溶库区渗漏研究[J].南水北调与水利科技,2016,14(3):150-155.

[10] 冯树荣,蒋中明.工程渗流理论研究与实践[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2018.

[11] 纪伟,赵坚,沈振中,等.水布垭水利枢纽岩溶体内防渗帷幕优化布置研究[J].水电能源科学,2005,23(1):36-39,91.

[12] 沈振中,岑威钧,徐力群,等.工程渗流分析与控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2020.

[13] 王硕,沈振中,徐力群,等.某抽水蓄能电站下水库混凝土面板坝防渗系统优选研究[J].水电能源科学,2023,41(2):90-94.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20241141

中图分类号:TV223.4;TV743

引用信息:

[1]马泽锴,沈振中,李东泽等.岩溶地区抽水蓄能电站下水库渗控方案优化[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(09):150-155.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20241141.

基金信息:

综合交通实验室开放基金课题(MTF2023010); 国家自然科学基金项目(52179130)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文