nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, v.44 131-135+40
抽蓄电站高沥青混凝土心墙堆石坝三维有限元地震反应分析
基金项目(Foundation): 广西重点研发计划(桂科AB24010047); 水能资源利用关键技术湖南省重点实验室开放研究基金(PKLHD202004)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2026.20250845
摘要:

以某抽水蓄能电站下水库沥青混凝土心墙堆石坝为例,通过三维非线性有限元地震反应计算,从坝体、心墙和防渗墙地震反应等方面分析了大坝的抗震安全性。结果表明,设计地震PGA 0.95 m/s2作用下,坝体顺河向、坝轴向、竖向动位移极值分别为3.00、2.15、1.26 cm,加速度极值分别为3.25、3.30、3.27 m/s2,相应的放大倍数分别为3.42、3.47、3.44;竖向永久变形极值为-8.21 cm,震陷率为0.10%。沥青混凝土心墙顺河向、坝轴向、竖向动位移极值分别为2.99、2.02、1.23 cm,加速度极值分别为3.25、3.26、3.04 m/s2;静动应变叠加后的心墙大、小主应变极值分别为2.01%、-0.85%;心墙竖向永久变形、震后变形极值分别为-5.99、-24.78 cm。防渗墙顺河向、坝轴向、竖向动位移极值分别为0.29、0.09、0.05 cm;静动应力叠加后的大、小主应力极值分别为7.61、-1.38 MPa。综合分析计算成果,坝体动位移和加速度分布及极值合理,沥青混凝土心墙拉应变和坝基混凝土防渗墙拉应力均未超标,因此大坝满足抗震安全性要求。

Abstract:

Taking the asphalt concrete core rockfill dam of the lower reservoir of a pumped storage power station as the research object, the seismic safety of the dam was analyzed from aspects of the seismic responses of the dam body, core wall and anti-seepage wall through three-dimensional nonlinear finite element seismic response calculation. The results show that under the action of PGA 0.95 m/s2, the extreme values of dynamic displacement of the dam along the river, axial and vertical direction of the dam are 3.00 cm, 2.15 cm and 1.26 cm, respectively. The extreme values of acceleration along the river, axial and vertical direction of the dam are 3.25 m/s2, 3.30 m/s2 and 3.27 m/s2, respectively, and the corresponding magnifications are 3.42, 3.47 and 3.44. The extreme value of vertical permanent deformation is-8.21 cm, and the seismic subsidence rate is 0.10%. The extreme values of dynamic displacement of asphalt concrete core wall along the river, axial and vertical direction of the dam are 2.99 cm, 2.02 cm and 1.23 cm, respectively. The extreme values of acceleration along the river, axial and vertical direction are 3.25 m/s2, 3.26 m/s2 and 3.04 m/s2, respectively. The extreme values of the major and minor principal strains of the core wall after the superposition of static and dynamic strains are 2.01% and-0.85%, respectively. The extreme values of vertical permanent deformation and post-earthquake deformation of the core wall are-5.99 cm and-24.78 cm, respectively. The extreme values of dynamic displacement of cutoff wall along the river, axial and vertical direction are 0.29 cm, 0.09 cm and 0.05 cm, respectively. The extreme values of the major and minor principal stresses after the superposition of static and dynamic stresses are 7.61 MPa and-1.38 MPa, respectively. Comprehensive analysis and calculation results show that the distribution and extreme value of dynamic displacement and acceleration of dam body are reasonable, and the tensile strain of asphalt concrete core wall and tensile stress of dam foundation concrete cutoff wall are not beyond the standard, so the dam meets the requirements of seismic safety.

参考文献

[1] 谢庆明,江守燕,曹庆明,等.沥青混凝土心墙风化料坝三维地震响应分析[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2015,37(1):22-28,42.(XIE Q M,JIANG S Y,CAO Q M,et al.Three-dimensional seismic responses analysis of weathering material dam with asphalt concrete core wall[J].Journal of China Three Gorges University (natural sciences),2015,37(1):22-28,42.(in Chinese))

[2] 冯蕊,何蕴龙.超深覆盖层上沥青混凝土心墙堆石坝防渗系统抗震安全性[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2016,49(1):32-38.(FENG R,HE Y L.Seismic response analysis of seepage control system of asphalt concrete core rockfill dam on thick overburden layer[J].Engineering Journal of Wuhan University,2016,49(1):32-38.(in Chinese))

[3] 李炎隆,唐旺,温立峰,等.沥青混凝土心墙堆石坝地震变形评价方法及其可靠度分析[J].水利学报,2020,51(5):580-588.(LI Y L,TANG W,WEN L F,et al.Dam seismic deformation evaluation method of asphalt concrete core rockfill dam and its reliability analysis[J].Journal of hydraulic engineering,2020,51(5):580-588.(in Chinese))

[4] 相彪,项甘雨,龚爱民,等.高心墙堆石坝抗震措施的数值模拟研究[J].水电能源科学,2022,40(10):105-108.(XIANGB,XIANG G Y,GONG A M,et al.Numerical simulation research on seismic measures of high core rockfill dam[J].Water resources and power,2022,40(10):105-108.(in Chinese))

[5] 王辉,岑威钧,王栋良,等.强震区某沥青混凝土面板堆石高坝抗震安全性分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2023,34(5):165-171.(WANG H,CEN W J,WANG D L,et al.Seismic safety of a high asphalt concrete-faced rockfill dam in strong earthquake area[J].Journal of water resources and water engineering,2023,34(5):165-171.(in Chinese))

[6] 王飞,宋志强,刘云贺,等.SV波空间斜入射下沥青混凝土心墙响应特性及抗拉破坏评价研究[J].岩土工程学报,2023,45(8):1733-1742.(WANG F,SONG Z Q,LIU Y H,et al.Response characteristics and tensile failure evaluation of asphalt concrete core wall under spatial oblique incidence of SV waves[J].Chinese journal of geotechnical engineering,2023,45(8):1733-1742.(in Chinese))

[7] KIM M K,LEE S H,CHOO Y W,et al.Seismic behaviors of earth-core and concrete-faced rock-fill dams by dynamic centrifuge tests[J].Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering,2011,31(11):1579-1593.

[8] SUNBUL B A,MUNGAN H,SüNBüL F,et al.Investigation of seismic behavior of a clay core rockfill dam using finite element method[J].Eurasian journal of civil engineering and architecture,2018(1):7-16.

[9] 岑威钧.土石坝抗震计算理论与应用——本构·流固耦合·地震动输入[M].北京:科学出版社,2022.(CEN W J.Seismic calculation theory and application for earth-rock dams[M].Beijing:Science Press,2022.(in Chinese))

[10] 国家能源局.水电工程水工建筑物抗震设计规范:NB 35047—2015[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2015.(National Energy Bureau of the People’s Republic of China.Code for seismic design of hydraulic structures of hydropower project:NB 35047—2015[S].Beijing:China Water & Power Press,2015.(in Chinese))

基本信息:

DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2026.20250845

中图分类号:TV312;TV641.4

引用信息:

[1]方博,成鑫.抽蓄电站高沥青混凝土心墙堆石坝三维有限元地震反应分析[J].水电能源科学,2026,44(03):131-135+40.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2026.20250845.

基金信息:

广西重点研发计划(桂科AB24010047); 水能资源利用关键技术湖南省重点实验室开放研究基金(PKLHD202004)

投稿时间:

2025-05-11

投稿日期(年):

2025

终审时间:

2025-05-28

终审日期(年):

2025

修回时间:

2026-01-08

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2026-01-05

出版时间:

2026-01-05

网络发布时间:

2026-01-05

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文