| 170 | 0 | 157 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
利用数值天气预报(NWP)产品作为模型输入进行洪水预报,可以显著延长洪水预报的预见期。若直接将未经校正的预报降水数据用于水文模型,会引入额外误差,进而影响洪水预报精度及预警效果。为校正NWP数据的偏差从而提升洪水预报的准确性,提出一种Stacking集成方法对预报降水进行统计后处理,该方法分为2层,第1层采用RF、KNN、XGB、LGB、Catboost、GBM共6种机器学习模型对欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)提供的预报降水产品分别进行校正,然后在第2层构建RF模型将6种机器学习校正结果进行集成,得到最终的校正预报降水数据。在山东省大汶河流域的应用结果表明,该方法能够有效融合多个机器学习模型的优势,优于单一机器学习模型,校正后降水的均方根误差从13.75 mm降至9.33 mm,相关系数由0.41提高至0.78,相对偏差由-10.95%减小至-1.40%,同时更准确地反映了降水强度的梯度特征。
Abstract:Using Numerical Weather Prediction(NWP) products as model inputs for flood forecasting can significantly extend the lead time of flood forecasts. However, directly using uncorrected forecast precipitation data in hydrological models can cause additional errors, thereby affecting the accuracy of flood forecasts and the effectiveness of early warnings. Therefore, correcting the bias of NWP data is crucial for improving the accuracy of flood forecasting. This study proposes a Stacking ensemble method for statistical post-processing of forecast precipitation. The method consists of two layers. In the first layer, six machine learning(ML) models, namely RF, KNN, XGB, LGB, Catboost, and GBM, are used to correct the forecast precipitation products provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts(ECMWF) respectively. Then, in the second layer, a random forest model is constructed to integrate the correction results of the six ML models, obtaining the final corrected forecast precipitation data. The application results in the Dawenhe Basin of Shandong Province show that this method can effectively integrate the advantages of multiple ML models, outperforming a single ML model. The root mean square error of the corrected precipitation decreased from 13.75 mm to 9.33 mm, the correlation coefficient increased from 0.41 to 0.78, and the relative bias decreased from-10.95% to-1.40%. At the same time, it more accurately reflects the gradient characteristics of precipitation intensity.
[1] 张建云.中国水文预报技术发展的回顾与思考[J].水科学进展,2010,21(4):435-443.
[2] 林诚杰,孙彤,王洁,等.多源融合降水驱动下的洪水预报适用性评估[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(3):17-21.
[3] 胡义明,梁忠民,蒋晓蕾,等.GFS集合降雨预报的校正后处理研究[J].南水北调与水利科技,2019,17(1):15-19.
[4] 陈许娜,李国芳,乔时雨.MSWEP降水产品在尼洋河流域的应用[J].水电能源科学,2024,42(10):33-38.
[5] 温立成,李致家.校正后的降雨格点预报在洪水预报中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2010,28(4):1-4.
[6] 卢松,高光平,张毅,等.基于随机森林的恩施地区降水预报订正方法研究[J].水力发电,2024,50(12):18-24,32.
[7] 曹子恒,李永坤,胡义明,等.基于机器学习模型的数值降雨预报校正[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2023,21(5):843-861,950.
[8] ZANDI O,ZAHRAIE B,NASSERI M,et al.Stacking machine learning models versus a locally weighted linear model to generate high-resolution monthly precipitation over a topographically complex area[J].Atmospheric research,2022,272:106159.
基本信息:
DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20250988
中图分类号:P457.6
引用信息:
[1]左政,梁忠民,毕成琳,等.基于Stacking集成框架的预报降水统计后处理研究[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(10):37-41.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20250988.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(52379007); 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX23_0712)