nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 10, v.43 75-78+69
颍河源流区水沙变化特征及趋势分析
基金项目(Foundation): 河南省科技攻关计划(GG202230)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20242018
摘要:

为了阐释自然与人类活动对河源区水沙演变的影响,以颍河源流区为例,根据告成水文站1975~2020年水沙实测数据,采用Mann-Kendall检验、累积离均差率法、R/S分析、双累积曲线、累积距平等方法研究其水沙变化趋势与特征。结果表明,源流区年径流表现为不明显下降趋势,年输沙量则呈极显著下降态势,两者的Hurst指数分别为0.596 8、0.860 6,表明其下降趋势在未来几年内还将持续;年水沙系列分别表现为6个、2个明显的变化阶段,两者变化的局部过程不同,但总体趋势大体一致;年际水沙关系演变反映在3个阶段(1975~1983、1984~2002、2003~2020年)双累积曲线线性关系的斜率依次递减,分别在1984、2003年发生明显的转折,可见随着人类活动的加剧,降低了输沙量对径流量的响应程度。

Abstract:

To explain the influence of natural and human activities on the evolution of water and sediment in the headwater region, taking the headwater region of Yinghe River as an example, the trend and characteristics of water and sediment change were studied by Mann-Kendall test, cumulative deviation rate method, R/S analysis, double accumulation curve and cumulative distance equality method based on the measured data of water and sediment from 1975 to 2020 in the hydrology station of Gaocheng. The results were as follows: The annual runoff in the source area showed insignificant downward trend while the annual sediment discharge was very significant downward trend, and this trend would continue in the next few years because Hurst exponent of the two were 0.596 8 and 0.860 6, respectively. The annual water and sediment series showed 6 and 2 distinct change stages, respectively. Local changing processes of the two were different, but the overall trend was the same. The evolution of the inter-annual water-sediment relationship was reflected in the slope of the linear relationship of the double accumulation curve decreasing successively in three stages(1975-1983, 1984-2002, 2004-2020), and obvious turning points occurred in 1984 and 2003, respectively. With the intensification of human activities, the response degree of sediment discharge to runoff is being reduced.

参考文献

[1] 常松木.颍河——大禹治水第一河[J].河南水利与南水北调,2012,41(19):24-25.

[2] 李中轩,吴国玺,许淑娜,等.颍河上游新石器时期的地貌变迁对史前聚落分布的影响[J].第四纪研究,2018,38(2):380-392.

[3] 刘静,张鑫钰,魏怀斌.闸控河流潜流带沉积物-水界面营养盐分布及交换通量研究[J].地球与环境,2023,51(6):593-603.

[4] 陈俊颖,张亚辉,杨吉强,等.基于水质目标管理的水功能区调整实践[J].南京大学学报(自然科学),2022,58(2):235-245.

[5] 白璐璐.基于GWAS模型研究的沙颍河生态流量调度浅析[J].治淮,2023(10):4-6.

[6] 郭金萍,郭薇.沙颍河流域季节性干旱的时空分布特征[J].浙江农业科学,2019,60(6):1046-1050.

[7] 冷梦辉,白桦,李二辉,等.洪水基流分割非参数检验方法优选[J].水资源保护,2021,37(4):82-88.

[8] 许红燕.浙江省主要河流水沙特征及变化趋势分析[J].水文,2015,35(3):84-91.

[9] 甄英,杨珊,何静,等.基于M-K检验法与R/S法的宜宾市降水量分析[J].四川师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,40(3):392-397.

[10] 董萌佳,李新攀.白沙水库水资源短缺成因及解决方案[J].河南水利与南水北调,2023,52(10):40-41.

[11] 马晓琳.白沙水库设计洪水复核探析[J].河南水利与南水北调,2017(4):85-86.

[12] 杨金艳,赵超,刘光生,等.基于Mann-Kendall和R/S法的水文序列变化趋势分析——以苏州市为例[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(2):27-30,137.

[13] 关颖慧,王淑芝,温得平.长江源区水沙变化特征及成因分析[J].泥沙研究,2021,46(3):43-49,56.

[14] 张辉,虞邦义,倪晋,等.近66 a来淮河干流水沙变化特征分析[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(3):6-11.

[15] 李聚照.登封市加大治水力度[J].中国水利,2000(11):34-34.

[16] 胡光伟,张明,黄作维,等.1956~2018年资江干流径流输沙演变规律与特征分析[J].水生态学杂志,2021,42(2):16-22.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20242018

中图分类号:P333

引用信息:

[1]王国重,李中原,张继宇,等.颍河源流区水沙变化特征及趋势分析[J].水电能源科学,2025,43(10):75-78+69.DOI:10.20040/j.cnki.1000-7709.2025.20242018.

基金信息:

河南省科技攻关计划(GG202230)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文